Skip to content

2010 elections

Following In the Footsteps of MSZP, Fidesz Has Also Exceeded the Legal Spending Limit

The joint initiative of Transparency International Hungary, Freedom House Europe and the Eötvös Károly Institute, the website www.kepmutatas.hu, published data, according to which, two days before the first round of the 2010 parliamentary elections, both MSZP and Fidesz exceeded the legal spending limit in their campaigns. The civil organizations estimate that MSZP has spent 650.94 million Ft and Fidesz has spent 475.619 million Ft, compared with the 386 million limit set by law. The three civil groups have been monitoring party campaigns since the beginning of the year. Their aim is to provide the public with a more precise picture of the actual campaign costs, thereby demonstrating that the current legal framework generates corruption and does not contribute to the transparency of campaign and party financing.

“It is not surprising at all that the two major parties have overspent the legally allowed ceiling, even before the first round of the elections”, said Noémi Alexa, executive director of Transparency International Hungary. She added that although this year’s campaign is expected to be considerably cheaper than the one in 2006, it is practically impossible to conduct an effective national campaign from the spending limit set by law.

According to Bálint Molnár, director of Freedom House Europe, the final costs of the campaigns will be known only at the end of May, as advertising expenses are aggregated approximately with a one-month delay. “I would not be surprised if the final amount of the major parties’ campaign expenditures approached or even significantly exceeded 1 billion Ft”, said Molnár, highlighting the fact that the current data do not yet include the party advertising expenses of March, even though these expenses are the biggest items of the campaigns. Besides the two major parties, Jobbik and MDF are also expected to outspend the 386 million limit in the final total.

The joint project of the three civil organizations focuses on estimating the actual campaign costs in the first place. The aim is to provide voters with a more complete picture of how party campaigns are conducted and how much they cost in reality. The organizations hope that their analysis, which has a strong methodological basis and is in progress at the same time as the campaign, will significantly contribute to making discussions about party and campaign finance reform less hypocritical, and to leave behind the political rhetoric that denies the actual costs of the political system. This is the only way to abolish the current, untenable practices and to create a system which rests on professionalism, transparency and accountability.

Campaign spendings of the municipal elections are non-transparent

The estimated spendings of the parliamentary parties based on the received data are published on www.kepmutatas.hu by TI Hungary after the closing of the elections.

Only symbolic decisions gestures presented so far

The reduction of the campaign period from 72 to 60 days is a gesture to be appreciated from the government’s side as a shorter period will most probably result in less campaign spending. On the other hand the unduly shortened time allowed to collect candidate cards as well as the modification of the ’campaign silence’ will not make campaign financing more transparent. The decrease of the period appointed for the gathering of candidate cards endangers the democratic elections and raises the chances of card misuse. Finally the 15 % cutback of the parties’ budget support will force them to cover their operational costs from other sources.

The core of the problem is the lack of suitable regulations to the controll parties’ revenue and costs. „Sources must be found by the parties but due to the absence of transparency we have no idea about the private and business interests that stand behind the parties.” – said Noémi Alexa, executive director of Transparency International Hungary. „Hence we suggest a more severe regulation of the parties’ reporting obligations, the introduction of a compulsory campaign account as well as the enlargement of authority for the control institutions. – added the leader of the anti-corruption organization.

Parties are the basic pillars of the democratic institutions – they must not violate law during the campaign

During the parliamentary elections party-spendings exceeded the HUF 1 million limit according to our calculations. They spent far more than the upper bound included in the law so their campaigns violated law.  The reports at the same time did not reflect their actual costs. In the case of municipal elections there is no law on spending limits, parties can spend without financial bounds. Only the legal assurance of transparency and accountability can guarantee significant achievements in the fight against corruption.

Related news

Campaign Spending of the Municipal Elections Are Non-Transparent

Following In the Footsteps of MSZP, Fidesz Has Also Exceeded the Legal Spending Limit

×